What will the BOC do about the $41 million deficit?
January 15, 2013 6 Comments
News crept out in the blogs late last week regarding the $41 million deficit facing our beloved county. Monday morning, the News and Record reported on this topic with a point-counterpoint series of quotes from Commissioner Jeff Phillips and Register of Deeds Jeff Thigpen.
Thigpen last year filed a mischievous lawsuit that sought to overturn North Carolina marriage law in order to pave the way for gay marriage. Now, he appears to be the spokesman for tax-and-spend local Democrats on budgetary matters. And he freely employs a common rhetorical ploy when he suggests that voters knew they were raising their own taxes when they passed the bonds four years ago. Of course, that is a wild stretch; but shamelessness is one of the requisite characteristics exhibited by this particular breed of politician.
We can attempt to recite all the instances of profligate spending over the years. But there is little point. Democratic gerrymandering over the last two decades has had a devastating impact on the well-being of our county. Repeated tax increases and massive local net job losses have been the legacy of this brand of leadership.
The big question mark at this point is what the new Republican majority will do to eradicate this deficit.
But I would argue that, for all practical purposes, we do not really have a Republican majority. Instead, we have a de facto Democratic majority because of one or more moderate Republicans who sit on the Board of County Commissioners.
Thus far, we have seen an underwhelming performance on the part of the new Republican “majority.” But it is early.
You can count on the Democratic commissioners to remain united in their efforts to prevent spending cuts. But if the past is any indication, Republicans will likely splinter. And that could result in yet another tax increase for county property owners– on top of the many other tax increases we have had locally over the last two decades.
How can we avoid this eventuality? Let’s count the ways:
1. Place a moratorium on new bond spending– immediately.
2. Resurrect all the spending reduction ideas generated by the C4GC summit that occurred during the spring of 2011.
3. Hire a county manager from private industry– and preferably from out of town– who will bring balance and a fiscally responsible approach. We need someone who is not tainted by the old corrupt machine politics.
4. Consider furloughs, lay-offs and reductions in work hours for county employees. Few of us would even notice the difference.
5. Eliminate set-aside programs.
6. Stop funding pet non-profits.
7. Differentiate needs from wants. Differentiate what is mandatory versus what is optional.
This deficit poses a major challenge for the new nominal Republican majority. They will either unite and tackle this challenge in a manner that avoids a tax increase; or they will drive many local conservative and Republican donors and volunteers back into the woodwork for another generation. The choice is theirs.
But here is an even better idea. They can find a way to cut taxes– in spite of the deficit. That might actually rally the troops instead of alienating them.
It will be interesting to watch how this drama unfolds.
Dr. Joe Guarino is a Guardian columnist.


Right on point, Joe. As always. Personally I think you should have to be a property owner in order to vote on taxes/bonds that affect our property taxes.
Let’s consider printing Guilford County Dollars $$$$. Oh wait, only Bernanke can do that.
But Joe’s 7 suggestiions have merit. Linda, are you listening ? I fervertenly hope so. The alternative is increseased taxes on already ovderburdened property owners..
Thanks, Diane. And I agree with you about voting on bond issues. The passage of the 2008 bonds was fueled in part by many voters who perceive they do not pay property taxes– and who simply were not even thinking about taxes.
Fred, thanks to you also. I hope all of the commissioners are listening.
Other ideas to save money? A hiring freeze (except for key department heads and the county manager).
And there are lots of department-specific reductions that could be made, and reductions to benefits offered county employees.
I have been talking about people voting on issues that dont have a stake in them, but I get attacked. The issue I have is with College kids voting here in Greensboro that stay on campus, the fact is that college addresses are not their homes but a temp address. The method to college kids voting is absentee voting in their home city/county. The college kids upset a balance in local elections and they dont have to live with the outcome, or even pay property taxes. I agree with Diane, bond issues are for the tax payer, renters are not stakeholderss, this is my biggest problem, renters. The renter can leave anytime he wants to another city or county, and we have to pay for their vote, property owners should have the voting power on bonds. The county Tax Office should send out ballots to voters on bonds this way it is faster and right to the property owner
In regards to #6 I like pets so I will give them some slack, cut welfare.
Thanks, Sal. In case I was not clear, I was referring to the politicos’ favorite non-profits that they love to fund.
I agree with you about the college students from out-of-town, who apparently came out in force during the 2008 election season.
Renters pay property taxes indirectly. But they do not PERCEIVE that they pay property taxes; and that makes all the difference.
I understand that renters pay taxes indirectly but they don’t pay the thousands that some have to pay. The best thing about renters is that they can get up and leave anytime they want, home owners are stuck with the taxes and have to worry about their property value going down and losing on their investment.